I don't think we would be shipping in September with that approach. :-P
But yes, at some point (start of 2019-12?) we really will need ramp up
an enforcement policy. It's just an unfortunate fact that removing
something can have a ripple effect on downstream technologies.
On 02.09.2019 10:52, Mickael Istria wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 10:44 AM Ed Merks <ed.me...@gmail.com
<mailto:ed.me...@gmail.com>> wrote:
But whose builds will fail?
The whole SimRel build fails for everyone. It's not really a matter of
pointing fingers to who should do what, it's more a matter of
enforcing a quality gate for the project delivery.
And then, if this quality gate is not reached, we see the build
failing, it annoys everyone and we can either fix the necessary parts,
or threaten them of removal from SimRel unless they get fixed promptly.
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
