Ok, yes we can put back the workaround that we added in M2.

If it's fixed in 2021-09 we'll remove it again like we did in M3 ;)

Thanks,
Patrick

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:11 PM Sravan K Lakkimsetti <
sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> Can org.slf4j.api be added to target platform in
> https://git.eclipse.org/c/tracecompass/org.eclipse.tracecompass.git/tree/releng/org.eclipse.tracecompass.target/tracecompass-e4.20.target
> (we get it from Orbit see
> https://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator.git/tree/eclipse.platform.releng.prereqs.sdk/eclipse-sdk-prereqs.target#n73)
>  and/or can this be added to
> https://git.eclipse.org/c/tracecompass/org.eclipse.tracecompass.git/tree/rcp/org.eclipse.tracecompass.rcp.product/tracing.product
> in the plugins section.
>
>
>
> We mirror org.slf4j.api from orbit. My preference here is to fetch from
> orbit.
>
>
>
> I would prefer not rebuild platform again.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Sravan
>
>
>
> *From:* Patrick Tasse <patrick.ta...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* 09 June 2021 20:59
> *To:* Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform
> contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We depend on platform which includes help feature.
>
> The help feature used to depend on jetty.http 10.0.2 which depends on
> org.slf4j 2.0, with Bundle-SymbolicName: slf4j.api
>
> The help feature now depends on jetty.http 10.0.4 which depends on
> org.slf4j 1.7, with Bundle-SymbolicName: org.slf4j.api
>
>
>
> The help feature.xml used to include feature slf4j.api, this has just been
> removed.
>
>
>
> So I believe the help feature.xml must now include feature org.slf4j.api
> instead?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:05 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti <
> sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Based on
> https://www.eclipse.org/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg18389.html
> there are some places you will need slf4j version 2. In all other places we
> should be good with slf4j 1.7.30.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Sravan
>
>
>
> *From:* Nitin Dahyabhai <thatnit...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* 09 June 2021 19:36
> *To:* Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform
> contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade
>
>
>
> WTP doesn't contribute it either, just the ones that were needed and not
> provided in the Platform build. What I find curious is that both
> https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/jetty/10.0.4/plugins/ and
> https://download.eclipse.org/webtools/jetty/10.0.4/repository/plugins/
> ended up with the 2.0.0 jar in their output. What I find troubling is that
> we use jetty-plus to resolve some OSGI Require/Provide-Capability
> configuration once installed, so I expect our build will compile cleanly
> but the related functionality will fail to load properly. :(
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:45 AM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
> wrote:
>
> :-( But the Platform contribution does not have slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1, is
> that because Platform doesn't use  jetty-jndi and jetty-plus but WTP does?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Jonah
>
>
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders
> www.kichwacoders.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 09:40, Nitin Dahyabhai <thatnit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like jetty-jndi and jetty-plus did not have their SLF4J ranges
> lowered under 2.0, so the Jetty sites from Platform and WTP both still
> contain slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:20 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti <
> sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I contributed eclipse platform with Jetty 10.0.4 and with slf4j 1.7.30.
> Please let me know if there are any problems.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Sravan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Nitin Dahyabhai
>
> Eclipse WTP PMC
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Nitin Dahyabhai
>
> Eclipse WTP PMC
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to