Sure. We would love to get some serious exposure. The panics you were seeing were probably due to missing locking framework not done while create/modify/delete of NICs/VNICs/flows. This beta would would focus on functionality, stability and performance.
Cheers, Sunay Siobhan P. Lynch wrote: > Nice, if you need help with the beta testing extensively under > "production" conditions, we're using this in a pilot of our hardware > product (obviously I can't give too much info without someone signing an > NDA), I'd love to work with you guys on providing feedback on the beta > release. > > Even the old beta works great on the boxes that it hasn't panic'd on. > I'm still not 100% sure why some (ostensibly identical) boxes panic and > others don't, however I'll be doing some comparison of PCI ids and > outputs of prtconf and prtdiag outputs, to see if hardware is slightly > different on what SHOULD be the identical motherboard. > > -SPL > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sunay Tripathi [mailto:Sunay.Tripathi at sun.com] > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 4:54 PM > To: Siobhan P. Lynch > Cc: rajagopal.kunhappan at sun.com; crossbow-discuss at opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: [crossbow-discuss] Panic on incoming TCP requests on snv61 > with XB 15 installed via Snapshot > > I think that is the target. We are starting a extensive beta in a few > weeks. If that goes well, then the current target to merge in nevada > is late april/early may. We will be able to accurately predict this > after the beta is done. > > Cheers, > Sunay > > Siobhan P. Lynch wrote: >> What are the chances of this being merged into the main branch within > a >> few months? I'd love to be able to use a standard SXCE install for >> this... and then the bfu archives for security related upgrades. >> >> -SPL >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rajagopal Kunhappan [mailto:rajagopal.kunhappan at sun.com] >> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 2:46 PM >> To: Siobhan P. Lynch >> Cc: crossbow-discuss at opensolaris.org >> Subject: Re: [crossbow-discuss] Panic on incoming TCP requests on > snv61 >> with XB 15 installed via Snapshot >> >> >> >> Siobhan Patricia Lynch wrote: >>> Hi all, I am having a major issue here, our product now relies upon >> vnics inside non-global zones as a way to solve a routing problem we >> encounter when using OpenVPN on a global zone. >>> Problem being, we have two machines working in the field just fine, >> but now I'm consistently getting panics on incoming TCP connects > (tried >> with ssh, telnet, and FTP ports): >>> panic[cpu0]/thread=d2be1de0: BAD TRAP: type=e (#pf Page fault) >> rp=d2be1ca4 addr=ec occurred in module "unix" due to a NULL pointer >> dereference >>> sched: #pf Page fault >>> Bad kernel fault at addr=0xec >>> pid=0, pc=0xfe832cbd, sp=0xf9259d00, eflags=0x10246 >>> cr0: 8005003b<pg,wp,ne,et,ts,mp,pe> cr4: >> 6f8<xmme,fxsr,pge,mce,pae,pse,de> >>> cr2: ec cr3: 1f31000 >>> gs: d2be01b0 fs: d2be0000 es: 160 ds: d2be0160 >>> edi: 0 esi: ec ebp: d2be1d1c esp: d2be1cdc >>> ebx: 80 edx: d2be1de0 ecx: ec eax: 0 >>> trp: e err: 2 eip: fe832cbd cs: 158 >>> efl: 10246 usp: f9259d00 ss: ec >>> >>> d2be1bfc unix:die+98 (e, d2be1ca4, ec, 0) >>> d2be1c90 unix:trap+11c4 (d2be1ca4, ec, 0) >>> d2be1ca4 unix:_cmntrap+7c (d2be01b0, d2be0000,) >>> d2be1d1c unix:mutex_enter+d (80, 0, 0, 1) >>> d2be1d78 ip:squeue_drain+165 (d27b4e40, 2, 97215e) >>> d2be1dc8 ip:squeue_worker+1be (d27b4e40, 0) >>> d2be1dd8 unix:thread_start+8 () >>> >>> syncing file systems... done >>> >>> I haven't started a full crash dump analysis, because I was hping >> maybe this is a known issue, and is fixed in a later version. >>> Also, which might be helpful, I'm using a GLDv3 bfe driver (v2.6.0a) >> that was compiled on another snv61-xb_15 machine (my laptop) >>> Also, where can I find sources to XB that I can build with nv78 or >> higher? I'm not thriolled in basing a security product off an older >> build, I don't mind rolling a new archive to bfu with on these > machines, >> but all I really care about is a stable machine that allows TCP to > work >> normally. >>> >> We are working on releasing newer crossbow bits and sources based on >> nv79 either this week or next. So hopefully the panic is fixed in that > >> and your above security concern will be allayed. >> >> Thanks, >> -krgopi >>> -SPL >>> >>> >>> This message posted from opensolaris.org >>> _______________________________________________ >>> crossbow-discuss mailing list >>> crossbow-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/crossbow-discuss >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> crossbow-discuss mailing list >> crossbow-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/crossbow-discuss > > -- Sunay Tripathi Distinguished Engineer Solaris Core Operating System Sun MicroSystems Inc. Solaris Networking: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/networking Project Crossbow: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/crossbow
