On 7/04/09 08:55 PM, Darren Reed wrote:
> # dladm show-link | grep stub
> stub0 etherstub 9000 unknown --
> vnicstub0 vnic 9000 up stub0
> vnicstub1 vnic 9000 up stub0
> vnicstub2 vnic 9000 up stub0
>
> # ifconfig vnicstub0
> vnicstub0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 9000 
> index 4
> inet 1.1.1.1 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 1.1.1.255
> ether 2:8:20:0:3e:29 # ifconfig vnicstub2
> vnicstub2: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 9000 
> index 6
> inet 1.1.1.3 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 1.1.1.255
> ether 2:8:20:9a:cc:f0 # ifconfig vnicstub1
> ifconfig: status: SIOCGLIFFLAGS: vnicstub1: no such interface
>
> # ping -s -i 1.1.1.3 1.1.1.255
> PING 1.1.1.255: 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=0. time=1.535 ms
> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.3: icmp_seq=0. time=12.149 ms
> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.3: icmp_seq=0. time=20.863 ms
> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=0. time=21.275 ms
>
> ... there should only be 2 replies...

and a local zone with an exclusive ip instance will add in its two 
packets worth too...

Darren


Reply via email to