> That's a vaild point. I suppose when you get down to it the answer > is historical: we've always lumped vlans and aggrs together, and > because of the extra work involved with aggrs, we just said support > for those would come later. As you know, we've had an exceptionally > hard time drawing boundaries around what nwam will and won't do, and > when each feature will be added; that was one clear line that we could > draw, so we've tried to stick to it. But after vnics came along, > psarc asked us (the nwam team) to figure out a way to at least co-exist > with them in phase 1; so we did that. > > We're on the verge of dev complete for nwam phase 1 (today or monday); > I'm loathe to add additional features at this point. But I suppose if > it's just a matter of adding an up-vlan call in net-nwam, it's hard to > argue against that. I'll investigate.
Sounds reasonable. To be clear, my goal was just to understand the problem space, not add more work. -- meem
