Hi, Anil:

PSARC/2009/364 is not going to part of 2010.03. The psarc case doesn't
address the enhancements to show-usage; that will follow subsequently.

-venu

On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, Anil wrote:

> In relation to the previous topic, will PSARC/2009/364 make the 2010.03 
> release of OpenSolaris? Just wanted to see when the performance improvements 
> in the show-usage (rather dlstat) will make it into the OS.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>>
>> Thanks, Anil.
>>
>> We don't have any details, incl. dates, for the
>> changes as yet.  We will
>> post it on this list when we do. In the meantime we
>> will check how we
>> can make incremental fixes available for this (or
>> else a workaround).
>>
>> -venu
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Anil wrote:
>>
>>> I doubt I am hitting into any kind of bottleneck on
>> the system. This is a x4150 quad core that has been
>> pretty idle. Usually, when people take network
>> measurements on the network gear, they sample at
>> every 5 minutes. 20 seconds is indeed too short.
>>>
>>> The new changes you guys are planning to implement
>> sounds like the right thing to do. But, right now I
>> am using 2009.06 and it'll be nice if the default of
>> 20 can be changed to something higher as an immediate
>> relief, that might be the easiest fix.
>>>
>>> When are these changes to the stats code going to
>> be implement and available?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> --
>>> This message posted from opensolaris.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> crossbow-discuss mailing list
>>> crossbow-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/crossbow-
>> discuss
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> crossbow-discuss mailing list
>> crossbow-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/crossbow-
>> discuss
> --
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> crossbow-discuss mailing list
> crossbow-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/crossbow-discuss
>

Reply via email to