-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [osol-code] GLDv3 NIC driver Performance on sparc
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:10:12 -0800
From: Garrett D'Amore <[email protected]>
To: opensolaris-code at opensolaris.org
On 03/10/10 10:48 AM, Mahesh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need some help in debugging the gldv3 driver performance issue on sparc.
> The driver has single Tx queue and 4 Rx queues and performs at almost the
> line rate(10G) on Sun intel boxes but the same driver performs very badly on
> sparc. The code is identical for sparc and intel except swapping involved
> since the hardware is little endian . Any idea how to debug this issue ??
> The machine i tried to bench mark is T5440 and i have tried setting
> ip_soft_rings_count = 16 on T5440 but result is same .
>
What is "badly"?
Note that T5440 hardware uses individual cores which are probably quite
a bit slower than an x86 core. Additionally, there could be resource
contention (caches, etc.) due to different Niagra architecture here.
Note also that I've been told that "bcopy" performs a bit slower on
Niagra than on other SPARC or x86 architectures -- are you using bcopy
to copy packet data, or are you using direct DMA? (Also, unless you
take care, DMA setup and teardown on SPARC systems -- which use an IOMMU
-- is quite expensive. In order to get good performance with direct
DMA you really have to use loan up or something like it. Its tricky to
get this right.)
Some other questions: what size MTU are you using? Are you sure that
you're hitting each of your 4 RX rings basically "equally" by using
different streams and making sure that traffic from a single stream
stays on the same h/w ring?
Is there a significant difference between TX and RX performance?
- Garrett
>
> Thanks
> Mahesh
>
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code at opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/crossbow-discuss/attachments/20100310/fbc3c292/attachment.html>