> If I were to do it I would have implemented this behavior in the server > instead of in the collecting of archetypes (that way it could be used in > maps as well), but this is fine too.
I voluntarily choose to do that at collect time, because doing it at item or map load time may be bad for loading performance. Also it's much easier to do it with Perl than C :) > I'm not sure what you mean. CrossEdit reads the archetypes exactly as > the server does. It won't know the difference because it will read the > archetypes after they've been collected and therefore after the collect > script has converted the attacktype values. The Java editor can use "raw" archetypes from the arch directory. Thus it needs too to support "attacktype fire". As I don't know Crossedit, I don't know whether it always uses collected archetypes or if it too can use uncollected ones. Nicolas Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ; 3615 LAPOSTENET (0,34/mn) ; tél : 08 92 68 13 50 (0,34/mn) _______________________________________________ crossfire mailing list crossfire@metalforge.org http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
