Le Samedi 21 Janvier 2006 11:53, Miguel Ghobangieno a écrit : > BSD or... the GPL. > You don't need an artistic license. > Both BSD and GPL are based on the definition of "source" and "binary" forms of the product. Those definition are unsuitable for work like visual art, because defining what the "source" and the "binary" forms of a picture are is just about impossible and questionable. That's the reason why the FSF invented the GFDL for written documentation instead of using the GPL, for example: the application of the GPL to such works was simply too difficult.
Besides that, the BSD licence is not compatible with the GPL and I don't agree with its terms, so that would have been a no-no even if it was applicable to a picture. One may of course nit-pick about complex ways of defining the "source" and the "binaries" of a visual artwork - but relying on obscure interpretations of a license to protect your work is definitely a bad strategy. -- Yann Chachkoff ----------------------- Garden Dwarf's Best Friend ----------------------- GPG Key : http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/export?id=9080288987474372064 Fingerprint: 6616 2E02 BAD2 4AEF C90A F1EB 7E03 AAB9 844D 25E0
pgpmVxzxdHM0D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ crossfire mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
