> There are a few functions in arch.c which are named > get_archetype_xxxxxx but in fact return a new object of that archetype > using arch_to_object. I plan to rename those create_object_xxxxxx, > which i think is more suitable. Any objection?
None by me, let they be renamed and some coherence made! :) Nicolas _______________________________________________ crossfire mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
