On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:39:59 +0800, Lalo Martins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:40:46 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote: > > One thing that could be added in the "nice to have" list is the > > support for migrating local branches to another repository. > > That's easy; all distributed revision control systems have that ability > (they call it "pushing" or "mirroring" the branch, depending on the > system). It's a requirement of the distributed model, for reasons you > expose quite well in your message.
Do you know if all of them allow any user to perform that mirroring? I thought that some of them required some action from the branch owner, not just any user (as I mentioned in my previous message, requiring the owner to do it would not fit in the "good support" category). If all of them provide good support for moving or mirroring local branches back to the "official" repository, then there is no need to add this feature to the comparison table. And anyway, I would prefer to avoid using local branches for the reasons explained in my other message. -Raphaël _______________________________________________ crossfire mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
