Mark Wedel wrote: > Andreas Kirschbaum wrote: > > [collect deleted objects and defer actual deletion] > > But to do that, yet another set of object pointers is needed (or > perhaps use teh objectlink structure) - you can't use the > next/above/below pointers, because if you mess with those, you now > have a case where the pointers don't point to expected data, which is > the entire problem we are running into.
Sorry, I implicitly meant a new linked list. We probably need just a plain linked list but no double linked list. Therefore an objectlink list probably is the way to go since this does not increase the object size by adding a pointer which almost always is NULL. Andreas _______________________________________________ crossfire mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
