Le lundi 24 novembre 2008, Lalo Martins a écrit : > Before anyone gets the impression I'm turning this into a Boost holy > war... let me reiterate I don't feel that strongly about it, just > answering Nicolas' questions here. > <snip> I see two good reasons for Nicolas favouring Qt over Boost:
- He's more familiar with Qt, and having to learn another toolkit, especially something as complex as Boost, would be somewhat of a waste of time; - Although you mentioned several things that integrate nicely with Boost, providing Internationalization or a crossplatform building system, the whole point is that all of this is provided inside the Qt tool suite, and requires no external/3rd party dependency. This is a significant advantage to me. My own, personal tastes lean towards Qt more than Boost, mostly for the way Qt extended the C++ language to make some fundamental mechanisms more accessible. It provides a level of simplicity more in touch with the capabilities of my old braincells :). Just my 0.02€ :) -- Lauwenmark. ------------ "Drive defensively: buy a tank."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ crossfire mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
