Yes. By the investigation so far, the architecture will be remained. Since, frankly speaking, we don’t have special requirements to change it right now. Once we can use it in practice, we will have opportunity to find something new. And many code of it can be re-used: script’s client, the server to manage sessions and forward commands, and part (maybe, whole) of Devtools server. To support Tizen-Xwalk may need more extra works.
From: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen [mailto:kenneth.christian...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 5:44 PM To: Wang, Peter H Cc: crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org; Chen, Guobing Subject: Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to Implement WebDriver for XWalk Sounds like a good idea. Will you be refactoring upstream code to leverage as much as possible, instead of reimplementing things in Crosswalk? Cheers Kenneth On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Wang, Peter H <peter.h.w...@intel.com<mailto:peter.h.w...@intel.com>> wrote: Hi all, I’d like to try to implement WebDriver for XWalk leveraging part of ChromeDriver code. The according bug record is https://crosswalk-project.org/jira/browse/XWALK-101. Refer to the attached file to find the background knowledge, our goal, and plan. Welcome your comments. Thank you very much. Regards, Peter Wang _______________________________________________ Crosswalk-dev mailing list Crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org<mailto:Crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org> https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Web Platform Architect, Intel Corporation. Phone +45 4294 9458 ﹆﹆﹆
_______________________________________________ Crosswalk-dev mailing list Crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev
