I say lets drop it

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Pozdnyakov, Mikhail
<mikhail.pozdnya...@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Does anyone know the rational behind xwalk::application namespace? Do we 
> treat "application" as a separate module from "runtime"? (imho runtime 
> without applications does not make much sense :) )
>
> If nobody objects I would get rid of xwalk::application namespace and move 
> the stuff from there simply to "xwalk" namespace.
>
> BR,
> Mikhail
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Finland Oy
> Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki
> Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4
> Domiciled in Helsinki
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Crosswalk-dev mailing list
> Crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org
> https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev



-- 
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Web Platform Architect, Intel Corporation.
Phone  +45 4294 9458 ﹆﹆﹆
_______________________________________________
Crosswalk-dev mailing list
Crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org
https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev

Reply via email to