LGTM. We definitely don't need canaries past the last branch point, and even within one release two weeks of history should be enough.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Crosswalk-dev [mailto:[email protected] > project.org] On Behalf Of Raphael Kubo da Costa > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:17 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Crosswalk-dev] RFC: Removing old canaries from > download.01.org? > > Hi all, > > As we add new canaries to download.01.org almost every day, we start using > more and more disk space. At some point in the future this is going to be a > problem. > > What do you think of removing canaries older than, say, 1 or 2 months? > I can't think of a reason for them to be there other than historical purposes. > _______________________________________________ > Crosswalk-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Finland Oy Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4 Domiciled in Helsinki This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. _______________________________________________ Crosswalk-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev
