We did some test on a real Linux machine and found the memory consumption between the two modes(service and single process) is small.
Maybe the difference of previous results is caused by the GPU process, as I used a Linux Virtual Machine without video acceleration. There's no GPU memory usage in the VM. Thanks, Xiang > -----Original Message----- > From: Pozdnyakov, Mikhail > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 7:45 PM > To: Santos, Thiago; Long, Xiang; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Crosswalk-dev] Crosswalk Shared Browser Process > > Hi there, > > I also did a simple measurement with 3 apps, my results are: > > 1. Shared process model > > 1.3 MiB + 171.0 KiB = 1.5 MiB xwalk-launcher (3) > 128.8 MiB + 22.6 MiB = 151.3 MiB xwalk (9) > > > 2. Single process model (using --single-process --disable-extension-process, > and with > the patch from Thiago) > > 119.7 MiB + 29.5 MiB = 149.2 MiB xwalk (3) > > > BR, > Mikhail > > ________________________________________ > From: Crosswalk-dev [[email protected]] on > behalf > of Thiago Marcos P. Santos [[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 5:12 PM > To: Long, Xiang; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Crosswalk Shared Browser Process > > On 26-03-2014 11:56, Long, Xiang wrote: > > I did a test with all the 8 apps mentioned in your wiki, and here's my > > result: > > > > 1. ./xwalk --single-process --disable-extension-process app_id > > Not sure if it will make any difference, but I'm using the full path to > the index.html, not the app_id here. > > _______________________________________________ > Crosswalk-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev _______________________________________________ Crosswalk-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev
