On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Jason Sallis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alex, have you considered using a shortened version of the revision hash for > display? With git, you can do 'git rev-parse --short HEAD' to get a more > readable but unique enough revision hash to id the build with. I'm not sure > if mercurial or other distributed vc systems have such an option, but it > would work for git at least. Just a thought. > > - Jason
This seems like a great solution, Jason. I'd definitely avoid a manually generated build ID - having the build ID tied directly to SCM is one of the nice things about cc.rb. _______________________________________________ Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users
