So, I like what Chad is proposing, but the lesson I learned adding CC.rb to the matrix is that the more data you put into the chart, the less valuable it is...
If you look at it as "Whever has the most green icons wins", then you get the one size fits all solution... And adding more options means that it makes it harder and harder to use. CC.rb is arguably the best solution for doing SVN based Ruby builds. But that isn't really reflected in that long list... I almost wonder if we need a summary and then a detail page.. Cause right now, looking at the page today, I am drowning in details! Eric On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Chad Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Eric Pugh > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have added CC.rb to the Matrix document. >> >> Eric > > I was thinking - there should be another icon to represent an Open > source or Plugin-Based architecture - meaning that even though a > feature does not exist, it can be added via a plugin or modification > of the source. > > This is a big advantage over Closed-Source tools or tools which do not > support Plugins. > > -- Chad > _______________________________________________ > Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users > _______________________________________________ Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users
