On 29 Aug 2008, at 17:31, Jeremy Lightsmith wrote:

the other file that you need is cruise_config.rb, this is a per project config file. in general, I'd suggest that it live inside the project itself, because it's much easier to configure that way. however, you can also place it in <cruise>/<project_name>/ and in fact there should be one there that cruise creates for you.

why do you want to do what you're suggesting? I'm with chad, I think it'd be easier to create a script that recreates the cruise environment on a new machine and uses files that you have checked into your project. However, I don't know exactly what you're trying to do, maybe you have a good reason for doing it the way you're suggesting.

Jeremy


Well basically I would like to be able to check-in and thus re-create the whole of our build environment (= ccrb app from github + our custom hacks thereto + project config) very easily from source control. This is for two reasons: - if we lose our server for some reason, it's trivial to recreate the build environment - people can easily clone the whole build environment and run it on their local dev machine, thereby reducing the friction of hacking and improving it

I'm used to CC.Net where we had all those horrible XML files in source control, which was about the one thing from those days that made any sense.

I take your and Chad's point about just checking in a script with the ./cruise add commands in it - I think that's what I'll do for now.

I guess some day it might be worth considering extending SourceControl.detect etc to read cruise_config.rb and see if there are any source control settings in there (in precedence to looking in the work folder for .git, .svn etc). This would allow you to check in the cruise_config.rb files and thus check in your source control config.

Does that make any more sense?

cheers,
Matt
----
http://blog.mattwynne.net
http://songkick.com

In case you wondered: The opinions expressed in this email are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of any former, current or future employers of mine.


On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Chad Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Matt Wynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a goal to allow any of us on the team to be able to fetch the build > environment locally and run / hack it, them commit their changes back and be
> able to easily deploy them to the team's shared build environment.

Instead of moving where CRUISE_DATA_ROOT is, maybe you could just make
a script which symlinks/copies the files you need from your project to
the default location of ~/.cruise.

For example, have a ./setup_ccrb.rb scrpt in your project which will
clone the git repo, set up the project by issuing the correct .cruise
add command, and symlink site_config.rb/css.  You would have the same
symlinks in the shared environment.  All the symlinked files could
live in the project - and there shouldn't be many more cruise-related
files to symlink than site_config and css, right?

-- Chad
_______________________________________________
Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users

_______________________________________________
Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users

_______________________________________________
Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users

Reply via email to