Hi, like Gabriel and Rahul I'd really like to see CRUNCH-105 (which looks good to commit, BTW) as part of the release. Other than that, I agree that waiting for some of the other open issues would delay the release for too long.
We've added cool stuff since 0.3.0, so let's release it :) Regards, Matthias On Wednesday, 2012-10-31, Rahul wrote: > Hi Josh, > > CRUNCH-105 would be a great new feature to have. CRUNCH-97 can be a > nice add-on if possible. > Also I would like to see fixes for CRUNCH-51 and CRUNCH-60 but I > think they are not ready yet and should not hold the release. > > regards, > Rahul > > On 31-10-2012 03:58, Josh Wills wrote: > >On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Gabriel Reid <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >>Hi Josh, > >> > >>Yep, I'd like to include CRUNCH-105 as well if possible. > >> > >>The only other potential issue that I see for inclusion is CRUNCH-51 > >>(fixing sorting to use multiple reducers). I actually think that this one > >>is > >>still too far from being ready, but I just want to put that out there to > >>make > >>sure it's clear that it's not (yet) in. > >> > >Understood. I would have liked to get MSCR fusion and the text parsing > >stuff in too, but they're not there yet. > > > > > >>- Gabriel > >> > >>On 30 Oct 2012, at 22:51, Josh Wills <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>>Hey all, > >>> > >>>I'd like to get our final preparations in place for the 0.4.0 Crunch > >>>release. Among the remaining issues, the only things that seem required > >>for > >>>the release are CRUNCH-63 (including the CHANGES.txt file), although it > >>>would be great to include CRUNCH-105 (DOT files for the planner) if at > >>all > >>>possible. > >>> > >>>I cc'd Roman on here so we can be sure that we position the release to be > >>>compatible w/Bigtop. Thanks to Matthias, we have both support for .tar.gz > >>>release files and binary release artifacts. We're using Hadoop 1.0.3 as > >>our > >>>default build target, although it is possible to do the build against the > >>>Hadoop 2.0.x APIs via the crunch.platform property in the top-level POM > >>>file. > >>> > >>>Question for everyone: is there anything else you would like to include > >>in > >>>0.4.0 that is close to completion? > >>>Question for Roman: is there anything else we should double-check on for > >>>Bigtop compatibility? > >>> > >>>Thanks, > >>>Josh > >>> > >>>-- > >>>Director of Data Science > >>>Cloudera <http://www.cloudera.com> > >>>Twitter: @josh_wills <http://twitter.com/josh_wills> > >> > > >
