Mark, Thanks for the review. > Your proposal looks fine to me. That's a nice performance improvement. > > I wonder if CRYPTO_ALWAYS_SYNCHRONOUS would be a better name? >
The term, BLOCKING, is needed in the name since we are considering another flag to indicate nonblocking. The term ALWAYS is implicit. How about CRYPTO_SYNCH_BLOCKING (the other flag to come can be CRYPTO_SYNCH_NONBLOCKING)? Thanks, -Krishna
