On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:29:00AM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote: > Jan Pechanec wrote: > >>I think you should follow the procedures described in RFC4395 and > >>register this URI scheme, particularly since you call it a URI. The > >>process is rather simple: fill out a form, send it to a specified > >>mailing list, answer questions from an expert reviewer, and you're done. > > > > I think it's a very good idea. We would need to extend the URI a > >little bit though. > > > > objecttype=(public|private|cert|symmetric) > > data is another object type in PKCS#11.
There's no need to get the spec nailed down hard before you register the URI type. For this particular URI you may want to make sure that you cc some appropriate criptoki or other such list.
