Anthony Scarpino wrote: > I had thought about going down this route, but backed away because it > was more invasive and caused changes to the error message. In > particular, some of the error messages would have to use the provider > description and not the module name.. > > So errors that use to look like: > > blowfish: [ID 733954 kern.warning] WARNING: blowfish did not register > with the cryptographic framework > > would have to look like: > > kcf: [ID 733954 kern.warning] WARNING: Blowfish Kernel SW Provider did > not register with the cryptographic framework > > If there is no problem seeing the provider description rather than the > module name, then I don't mind changing that..
I don't see any issue with those messages, in fact they are actually more descriptive. -- Darren J Moffat
