CRYPTO-GRAM

                March 15, 2010

              by Bruce Schneier
      Chief Security Technology Officer, BT
             [email protected]
            http://www.schneier.com


A free monthly newsletter providing summaries, analyses, insights, and commentaries on security: computer and otherwise.

For back issues, or to subscribe, visit <http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram.html>.

You can read this issue on the web at <http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-1003.html>. These same essays and news items appear in the "Schneier on Security" blog at <http://www.schneier.com/blog>, along with a lively comment section. An RSS feed is available.


** *** ***** ******* *********** *************

In this issue:
     Al-Mabhouh Assassination
     Small Planes and Lone Terrorist Nutcases
     News
     The Doghouse: Demiurge Consulting
     Schneier News
     TSA Logo Contest Winner


** *** ***** ******* *********** *************

     Al-Mabhouh Assassination



I've been fascinated by the assassination of Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Mabhouh -- not the politics, but the tactics -- mostly because the Dubai police released surveillance video of the assassins moving around the city. (The actual assassination took place in a hotel room, and there's no video of that.)

I used the story as a news hook for a CNN.com essay on surveillance cameras. Here's the first paragraph:

    On January 19, a team of at least 15 people assassinated Hamas leader
    Mahmoud al-Mabhouh. The Dubai police released video footage of 11
    of them. While it was obviously a very professional operation, the
    27 minutes of video is fascinating in its banality. Team members
    walk through the airport, check in and out of hotels, get in and
    out of taxis. They make no effort to hide themselves from the
    cameras, sometimes seeming to stare directly into them. They
    obviously don't care that they're being recorded, and -- in fact
    -- the cameras didn't prevent the assassination, nor as far as we
    know have they helped as yet in identifying the killers.

A former CIA field officer wrote an interesting essay on the al-Mabhouh assassination:

    The truth is that Mr. Mabhouh's assassination was conducted
    according to the book -- a military operation in which the
    environment is completely controlled by the assassins. At least 25
    people are needed to carry off something like this. You need "eyes
    on" the target 24 hours a day to ensure that when the time comes
    he is alone. You need coverage of the police -- assassinations go
    very wrong when the police stumble into the middle of one. You
    need coverage of the hotel security staff, the maids, the outside
    of the hotel. You even need people in back-up accommodations in
    the event the team needs a place to hide.

I found this conclusion of his incredible:

    I can only speculate about where exactly the hit went wrong. But I
    would guess the assassins failed to account for the marked advance
    in technology.

    [...]

    Not completely understanding advances in technology may be one
    explanation for the assassins nonchalantly exposing their faces to
    the closed-circuit TV cameras, one female assassin even smiling at
    one.... The other explanation -- the assassins didn't care whether
    their faces were identified -- doesn't seem plausible at all.

Does he really think that this professional a team simply didn't realize that there were security cameras in airports and hotels? I think that the "other explanation" is not only plausible, it's obvious.

The number of suspects is now at 27, by the way.  And:

    Also Monday, the sources said the UAE central bank is working with
    other nations to track funding and 14 credit cards -- issued
    mostly by a United States bank -- used by the suspects in
    different places, including the United States.

We'll see how well these people covered their tracks.

This is my first blog post, which got a lot of reader speculation:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/02/al-mabhouh_assa.html

The surveillance video, in three parts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JghQ0ZcRfQs&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8XDhnEJ-N0&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWxjxTaWytE&feature=player_embedded

My CNN.com essay:
http://www.schneier.com/essay-309.html
The surveillance camera industry rebuttal:
http://www.securityinfowatch.com/surveillance-industry-responds-bruce-schneier or http://tinyurl.com/ybmanxq

More speculation on how the assassins got into al-Mabhouh's hotel room:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/03/breaking_in_to.html

The former CIA's officer's essay:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704479404575087621440351704.html or http://tinyurl.com/ye2dtpp

More commentary on the tactics:
http://www.thecoldspy.com/middle-east/assassination-tango-mahmoud-al-mabhouh-2/ or http://tinyurl.com/yzoa4r9 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article7034933.ece or http://tinyurl.com/yl99yyb

Speculation that it's Egypt or Jordan.  I don't believe it.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1153316.html

Mossad?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/feb/19/ian-black-mossad-dubai

http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/03/01/uae.murder.probe/index.html?hpt=T2 or http://tinyurl.com/yfo4lry


** *** ***** ******* *********** *************

     Small Planes and Lone Terrorist Nutcases



A "Washington Post" article concludes that small planes are not the next terror threat. What this analysis misses is our ability to terrorize ourselves. After all, who thought that a failed terrorist incident -- nobody hurt, no plane crash, terrorist in custody -- could cause so much terror?

On the face of it, Joseph Stack flying a private plane into the Austin, TX IRS office is no different than Nidal Hasan shooting up Ft. Hood: a lone extremist nutcase. If one is a terrorist and the other is a criminal, the difference is more political or religious than anything else.

Personally, I wouldn't call either a terrorist. Nor would I call Amy Bishop, who opened fire on her department after she was denied tenure, a terrorist.

I consider both Theodore Kaczynski (the Unabomber) and Bruce Ivins (the anthrax mailer) to be terrorists, but John Muhammad and Lee Malvo (the DC snipers) to be criminals. Clearly there is a grey area.

I note that the primary counterterrorist measures I advocate -- investigation and intelligence -- can't possibly make a difference against any of these people. Lone nuts are pretty much impossible to detect in advance, and thus pretty much impossible to defend against: a point Cato's Jim Harper made in a smart series of posts. And once they attack, conventional police work is how we capture those that simply don't care if they're caught or killed.

Washington Post article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/19/AR2010021905765.html or http://tinyurl.com/yeeegrn

Joseph Stack:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,586929,00.html

Nidal Hasan:
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1938415,00.html

Discussing the difference:
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/02/23/newsweek/index.html or http://tinyurl.com/yzjvgxx http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/02/22/muslim-activists-question-terrorism-definition/ or http://tinyurl.com/yc59c24 http://correspondents.theatlantic.com/lane_wallace/2010/02/what_qualifies_as_terrorism.php or http://tinyurl.com/y9ghefd http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/02/19/austin-plane-crash-suicide-or-terrorism/ or http://tinyurl.com/yfffsnc

Amy Bishop:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/crime/2940-prof-kills-three-at-uah-a-gun-free-school-zone or http://tinyurl.com/ye8vw69

Theodore Kaczynski:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Kaczynski

Bruce Ivins:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/20/us/20anthrax.html

John Muhammad and Lee Malvo:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DC_snipers

Jim Harper's blog posts:
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/11/10/the-search-for-answers-in-fort-hood/ or http://tinyurl.com/yhbcb9g http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/11/11/fort-hood-reaction-response-and-rejoinder/ or http://tinyurl.com/y997ngc http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/11/17/fort-hood-that-no-such-attack-ever-occurs-again/ or http://tinyurl.com/yfqw64p


** *** ***** ******* *********** *************

     News



I had no idea this was being done, but erased answers are now analyzed on standardized tests. Schools with a high number of wrong-to-right changes across multiple tests are presumed to have cheated: teachers changing the answers after the students are done.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/12/education/12georgia.html

A new Trojan Horse named Spy Eye has code that kills Zeus, a rival botnet.
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9154618/New_Russian_botnet_tries_to_kill_rival or http://tinyurl.com/ybkrgrj

Interesting blog post, with video demonstration, about an improved tool to open high security locks with a key that will just "form itself" if you insert it into the lock and wiggle it a little. The basic technique is a few years old, but the improvements discussed here allow the tool to open a wider variety of locks than before.
http://blackbag.nl/?p=1122

There was a big U.S. cyberattack exercise last month.  We didn't do so well.
http://www.darkreading.com/security/cybercrime/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=222900775 or http://tinyurl.com/y9mqfj9 http://www.thenewnewinternet.com/2010/02/16/more-must-be-done-to-prepare-us-for-cyber-attack/ or http://tinyurl.com/ydv6e5f

This debit card skimmer is installed inside gas pumps. There's nothing the customer can detect.
http://www.sacbee.com/crime/story/2420301.html
"LVMPD found that one of these skimmers can be installed in eight minutes flat." Also, pictures.
http://bobarno.com/thiefhunters/2009/06/new-skimmers/

Mark Twain on risk analysis, from 1871:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/02/mark_twain_on_r.html

Just declassified by the NSA: "A Reference Guide to Selected Historical Documents Relating to the National Security Agency/Central Security Service, 1931-1985." Formerly "Top Secret UMBRA." From my quick scan, there are minimal redactions.
http://www.governmentattic.org/3docs/NSA-SelHistDocs_1931-1985.pdf

It's a really creepy story: a school issues laptops to students, and then remotely and surreptitiously turns on the camera.
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/02/remotely_spying.html

Hitler and cloud computing: a funny video by Marcus Ranum and Gunnar Peterson.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjfaCoA2sQk

Nice essay by Tom Engelhardt on fear of terrorism:
http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175206/
Similar sentiment from Newsweek:
http://www.newsweek.com/id/233591

Crypto implementation failure? I originally thought this AES-encrypted USB memory stick was one, but a blog reader corrected me.
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/03/crypto_implemen.html

On March 2, the White House published an unclassified summary of its Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative (CNCI).
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/03/comprehensive_n.html

Interesting paper: "A Practical Attack to De-Anonymize Social Network Users."
http://www.iseclab.org/papers/sonda-TR.pdf
News article:
http://www.darkreading.com/insiderthreat/security/client/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223100436 or http://tinyurl.com/yldt8uf
Moral: anonymity is really, really hard -- but we knew that already:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/04/identifying_peo.html
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/05/on_the_anonymit.html

Good legal paper on the limits of identity cards: Stephen Mason and Nick Bohm, Identity and its Verification." http://www.stephenmason.eu/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/bohm-mason-identity.pdf or http://tinyurl.com/ycmhvsm

Eating a flash drive: how not to destroy evidence/
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2010/0302101flash1.html

IARPA -- the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity, the U.S. intelligence community's answer to DARPA -- wants a trust detector. It's good to dream. http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-02/us-spooks-want-better-gauge-trust-matter-life-and-death or http://tinyurl.com/yhpvxnk

Interesting commentary by Marc Rotenberg on Google's Italian privacy case:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marc-rotenberg/brandeis-in-italy-the-pri_b_481115.html or http://tinyurl.com/yk9ofss

A hollowed-out U.S. nickel can hold a microSD card.
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/02/16/hollow-spy-coins-for.html
Pound and euro coins are also available.
https://makersmarket.com/sellers/82-brian-dereu
Old blog post about this:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/12/hollow_coins.html

Nose biometrics:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8543292.stm

A guide to Microsoft police forensic services was leaked online.
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/03/guide_to_micros.html

Over at Wikibooks, they're trying to write an open source cryptography textbook.
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cryptography

Interesting paper on typosquatting:
http://www.benedelman.org/typosquatting/typosquatting.pdf
http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2010/02/17/measuring-typosquattings-perpetrators-and-funders/ or http://tinyurl.com/ygnya9y

Cartoon: why DRM doesn't work:
http://www.bradcolbow.com/archive.php/?p=205

Google in The Onion:
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/google_responds_to_privacy

This USB combination lock is a promotional security product designed by someone who knows nothing about security. The USB drive is "protected" by a combination lock. There are only two dials, so there are only 100 possible combinations. And when the drive is "locked" and the connector is retracted, the contacts are still accessible. Maybe it should be given away by companies that sell security theater.
http://www.staplespromotionalproducts.com/ProductDetail.aspx?id=2953

The Spanish police arrested three people in connection with the 13-million-computer Mariposa botnet. http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100303/tc_afp/spaincanadausitinternetsoftwarecomputercrime or http://tinyurl.com/ykv2bza http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/04/mariposa_police_hunt_more_botherders/ or http://tinyurl.com/ycursrx
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f6960e5a-2711-11df-b84e-00144feabdc0.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/click/rss/1.0/-/2/hi/technology/8547453.stm
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article7047853.ece
http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-10462718-245.html
http://defintel.blogspot.com/2009/10/mariposa-botnet-analysis.html


** *** ***** ******* *********** *************

     The Doghouse: Demiurge Consulting



They claim to be "one of the nation's only and most respected security and intelligence providers" -- I've never heard of them -- but their blog consisted entirely of entries copied from my blog since December 24. The posts were credited to "Anonymous," and weren't linked back to my blog. They didn't even cull the posts that were obviously me: posts about interviews I've given, for example.

I contacted them last month and asked that they stop stealing my blog posts. I got an apologetic e-mail in response:

    Please accept my apologies about the republishing of your blog
    posts.

    Quite honestly our web development team was tasked with finding
    some interesting content to keep the blog component of our firm's
    website compelling and up to date; it is clear that they took my
    request out of context.  Ironically, I rarely even look at my own
    firm's website!

    I have had them stop the republishing immediately.  I know of you
    by reputation, truly respect your work and thank you for being so
    gracious in your request; you very well could have been obtuse.

    Again, I personally apologize for this situation.

    Best,

    Karim

Karim is Karim Hijazi, whose e-mail sig file identifies him as "Principal/Founder." Despite the nice e-mail, nothing happened for a week. They didn't steal any new posts, but they didn't take down the old ones either. I suppose I could have sued them, but public ridicule seemed more fitting.

So I posted the above information to my blog. The stolen posts immediately came down, with this message in their place:

    Speaking to the team that handles the blog component of the
    Demiurge website, I have learned not only have they been able to
    find at least 23 other websites syndicating content from Mr.
    Schneier's blog, but there are more than three websites offering
    full blog post syndication links including Schneier's blog.

    Further, why would you find it offensive if we find your content
    very interesting to our clientele? If we really were trying to
    make it look like our content, don't you think we would have
    scrubbed it? Besides all the links went back to your bloody
    blog... just more viewers for you. You weren't thinking when you
    tried to flame us Bruce.

    All you had to do was ask us to stop syndicating, which we did.

That's now gone, and there's a reworked website.

http://www.demiurgeconsulting.com/

Blog entry:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/02/the_doghouse_de.html


** *** ***** ******* *********** *************

     Schneier News



I finally have control of my Facebook page. There'll be nothing on it that isn't on my blog or Crypto-Gram, but some of you might prefer following my writing from there.
http://www.facebook.com/bruce.schneier

I also have a Twitter account, although I've never posted. And a Twitter feed for my blog, which simply announces and links to each post.
http://twitter.com/schneier
http://twitter.com/schneierblog/

Interviews:
http://www.v3.co.uk/v3/news/2258899/rsa-2010-q-bruce-schneier
http://www.simple-talk.com/opinion/geek-of-the-week/bruce-schneier-geek-of-the-week/ or http://tinyurl.com/yl7ro58

I'm speaking via video link at the 2nd Annual Data Protection Conference, in Dublin, Ireland. http://www.ics.ie/index.php/component/option,com_eventlist/Itemid,61/id,41/view,details/ or http://tinyurl.com/ycjfs35

I'm speaking at the CACR Higher Education Security Summit in Indianapolis, IN, on April 1.
http://www.indiana.edu/~uits/cacrsummit10/


** *** ***** ******* *********** *************

     TSA Logo Contest Winner



In January, I announced a contest to redesign the TSA logo. Last week, I announced the five finalists -- chosen by Patrick Smith from "Ask the Pilot" and myself -- and asked you all to vote on the winner.

Four hundred and seven votes later, we have a tie. No really; we have a tie. Rhys Gibson and "I love to fly and it shows" have 135 votes each. (It's still a tie at 141 votes each if I give half credit for all split votes.) Both are well ahead of the third place winner, with 81 votes. There were a few ambiguous comments that could possibly break the tie, but rather than scrutinize the hanging chad any more closely, I'm going to appeal to the judges to cast the deciding votes.

Although both logos are excellent, both Patrick Smith and I vote for Rhys Gibson.

Congratulations.

Contest announcement:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/01/tsa_logo_contes.html

Semi-finalists:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/02/tsa_logo_contes_1.html

Winner:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/02/tsa_logo_contes_2.html


** *** ***** ******* *********** *************

Since 1998, CRYPTO-GRAM has been a free monthly newsletter providing summaries, analyses, insights, and commentaries on security: computer and otherwise. You can subscribe, unsubscribe, or change your address on the Web at <http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram.html>. Back issues are also available at that URL.

Please feel free to forward CRYPTO-GRAM, in whole or in part, to colleagues and friends who will find it valuable. Permission is also granted to reprint CRYPTO-GRAM, as long as it is reprinted in its entirety.

CRYPTO-GRAM is written by Bruce Schneier. Schneier is the author of the best sellers "Schneier on Security," "Beyond Fear," "Secrets and Lies," and "Applied Cryptography," and an inventor of the Blowfish, Twofish, Threefish, Helix, Phelix, and Skein algorithms. He is the Chief Security Technology Officer of BT BCSG, and is on the Board of Directors of the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC). He is a frequent writer and lecturer on security topics. See <http://www.schneier.com>.

Crypto-Gram is a personal newsletter. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BT.

Copyright (c) 2010 by Bruce Schneier.

Reply via email to