Adam Back wrote: > > I presume that the TLS WG is planning to use DES to replace the RC4 > > 40 bit cipher that was used for export compliance. > > I saw no indication that this was the case, though this sounds better > than just adding DES and leaving all the 40 bit ciphersuites intact > which looks like what the current plan is by my reading. There's no indication either way, since the new ciphersuites are a standalone I-D, not a modification to TLS. Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
- so why is IETF stilling adding DES to protocols? (Re... Anonymous
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to proto... Jeffrey I. Schiller
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... Anonymous
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... Ben Laurie
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... David Honig
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... Lucky Green
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... William H. Geiger III
- DES vs RC4 -- A correction (Re: so why is I... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to proto... Ben Laurie
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... Jeffrey I. Schiller
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... Anonymous
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... Lucky Green
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding ... Ben Laurie
