[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> We've been recently working on what seems like a neat new clock
>> synchronization protocol, which will hopefully offer proactive security
>> (recovery from penetrations, see http://www.hrl.il.ibm.com/proactive).
>> Surprisingly, it also appears a very practical protocol. It has been some
>> time since I last worked on clock synchronization, so I wonder, what is the
>> state of the art - practical protocols (any substantially change in NTP
>> recently or any serious alternative), and protocols designed to withstand
>> attackers (of course I'll be esp. interested if there's anything with some
>> recovery properties!!).
Last I checked, the IETF was spinning up a working group to work on
secure time synchronization again. I can't find any reference to it
on the IETF web site right now, but I'm sure they'd appreciate a good
candidate protocol.
Marc
