Actually, um, kiddies, the more "corruption", the better. Corruption 
meaning "greed". Profit, in other words.

I say buy the bastards off. Literally.

Make so much money with financial cryptography, with economic 
cryptography, with crypto-economics, that state actors -- like Reno, 
and Aaron, and the Chinese Communist Party, and erst-KGBs everywhere 
-- have to go play in the other room or they'll piss their 
constituents off.


The reason Wassenaar, et. al., is going to fail, *is* failing, has 
nothing to do with politics. It has nothing to do with "human rights" 
as defined in any political sense. It certainly has nothing to do 
with morals. In fact, the more politics, and even appeals to 
morality, that they use to try to get what they want, the better I 
like it. It'll be like watching someone apply the "power" of prayer, 
or positive thinking, or moral suasion, to gravity -- then stepping 
off a cliff.


It has *everything* to do with economics, however, and that's what 
makes their job completely impossible, and mine so emotionally 
satisfying.

The more money people make with internet commerce, the fewer legs 
totalitarians will have to stand on when they call for the 
criminalization of strong cryptography.


By creating cypherspace out of cyberspace, internet cryptography 
protects the execution, and someday clearing and settlement, of 
internet transactions, and as a result, internet *business*. Internet 
business is much more important than meatspace *government* is, much 
less its military or police. After all, if there is no business, 
there is nobody to extort economic economic rent from. Obviously, the 
economics of financial cryptography will someday ensure that 
nation-sates are not going to *have* anyone to extort economic rent 
from. But nation-states certainly don't understand that, and, even if 
they did, they couldn't stop it anyway, because, again, people will 
save, will *earn*, too much money, too much *profit*, when they use 
strong cryptography on the internet to conduct their business.

And, fortunately for those of us who are making the geodesic economy 
a reality, states are so focused on repressing their populations, 
using the *politics* of cryptography, that they don't see the 
invisible hand of the market eventually squashing them like bug.

So, again, financial cryptography -- economic cryptography -- is the 
only cryptography that matters.

Political cryptography, as practiced by states, *or* their enemies, 
no matter how august they are or pure their intention, is almost as 
useless as cryptopolitics.

In fact, the more state actors practice cryptopolitics and political 
cryptography, the better I'm beginning to like it.

Here's hoping that the cryptography community concentrates on where 
the money is. So, of course, they can give erstwhile totalitarians a 
fat tip detailing the car so nice.


Cheers,
RAH

-----------------
Robert A. Hettinga <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

Reply via email to