On 13 Aug 1999, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Um, pardon my ignorance, but what is the point of a diskless,
> keyboardless computer that requires such high security? If the only
> interface is the network, what good is it?
There are gadgets called "routers" and "firewalls" whose whole reason to
exist is their network interfaces. They usually lack keyboards and often
lack disks, and the people who install them tend to think about security
quite a bit.
> (although why anyone would build a diskless machine in today's world,
> I have no idea -- it certainly doesn't significantly affect the cost
> of the machine).
It does affect its noise level, power consumption, and reliability. And
you are underestimating how much it can affect the cost of inexpensive
specialized devices.
Henry Spencer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Re: Summary re: /dev/random Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: Summary re: /dev/random Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: linux-ipsec: Re: Summary re: /dev/r... Henry Spencer
- Re: Summary re: /dev/random David Honig
- Re: Summary re: /dev/random Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: linux-ipsec: Re: Summary re: /dev/r... John Denker
- Re: linux-ipsec: Re: Summary re: /dev/r... Nick Szabo
- Re: linux-ipsec: Re: Summary re: /dev/r... David Honig
- Re: Summary re: /dev/random Derek Atkins
- Re: linux-ipsec: Re: Summary re: /dev/r... Gary E. Miller
- semantics of /dev/{u}random Henry Spencer
- semantics of /dev/{u}random William Allen Simpson
- Another web secure mail service John R Levine
- Re: depleting the random number generat... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: depleting the random number generator John Kelsey
- Re: depleting the random number generator John Kelsey
- Re: depleting the random number generator David Honig
- Re: depleting the random number generator Bill Stewart
- Re: depleting the random number generator Ben Laurie
