> > Are you saying that there are existing encryption programs for the
> > Pilot or that there are better languages to program it in? (Basic
> > really isn't bad for something like RC4)
>
> If I understand it correctly, there exists a Pilot C (C++ ?) development
> suite for Windows from Metrowerks.
And there are development tools (cross-compiler & emulator) for unix
as well.
> [...]
> Indeed. Thats why I originally coded MD5 on my 92, I was going to
> put together an S/key calculator for it. But then the need for S/key
> thankfully went away, and my remote-access needs switched entirely
> to SSH.
My pilot has both ssh and pgp on it, as well as an s/key calculator.
All this stuff is out there, and free!
(I feel the moderator's scissors closing on this thread....)
Matt
- Paul Brown on Solitiare randomness flaw? Dave Del Torto
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomness flaw? William H. Geiger III
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomness flaw... Arnold Reinhold
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomness ... mgraffam
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomn... Arnold Reinhold
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare ra... Paul Crowley
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare ra... Bill Stewart
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiar... Arnold Reinhold
- crypto on calculators mgraffam
- Re: crypto on calculat... Matt Crawford
- Re: crypto on calculat... Bill Stewart
- Re: crypto on calculat... Bill Frantz
- Re: crypto on calculat... Alan Olsen
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomn... Thomas W. Kellar
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare ra... Arnold Reinhold
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomness ... Anonymous
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomn... Anonymous
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomness flaw? amanda
- RE: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomness flaw? Kuehn, Ulrich
- RE: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomness flaw... Arnold Reinhold
