In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Allen Ethridge writes: > On 10/13/99 at 7:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Gutmann) wrote: > > > Why not refrain in the *expectation* that it'll be done incompetently? > > ... > > > > If they want to play big brother, why not give them more than enough rope, > > point at a conveniently-placed tree limb if necessary, and then stand back? My concern is my privacy -- a poorly-designed system is likely to let lots of folks in, not just law enforcement officers operating under a legitimate warrant. > > None of these things happened when CALEA was implemented in the traditional > circuit-switched voice network. CALEA advocates already have a success to poi > nt > to. CALEA is not yet implemented; among the reasons are that the requirements from the FBI mandate a complex, expensive design. In other words, it's not a success. --Steve Bellovin
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into t... Ted Lemon
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into t... P.J. Ponder
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into t... Russell Nelson
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into t... Steve Reid
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping in... Declan McCullagh
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into the In... Peter Gutmann
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into t... Allen Ethridge
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into the In... Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into t... Paul A. Lambert
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into the In... Jeff . Hodges
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into the In... Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into t... Allen Ethridge
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into the In... Steven M. Bellovin
