It is more important to look at both sources, and document the protocol(s),
for interoperability! Enough religiousity on source licenses. Let's get
together and do it!
Ted Lemon wrote:
>
> > SpeakFreely (http://www.speakfreely.org) is already open source, so it
> > sets a minimum bar on the restrictions you can expect to be able to
> > set on the distribution of a freeware encrypting telephone package.
>
> Precisely. Too bad, though - I'd like to see PGPphone Open Sourced.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
