"L. Sassaman" wrote: > > > If a Microsoft user configures 3DES protection and tries to connect it > > a Linux FreeS/WAN box, the negotiation will fail -- with at least the > > Linux side reporting that they couldn't agree. > > Frankly, I can't understand why the IPsec protocol still allows DES. It > should require strong encryption. Having DES in a product these days makes > about as much sense as mandating the usage of ROT13. > We are waiting for AES.
- Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES instead o... Declan McCullagh
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES ... John Gilmore
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of ... John Young
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use... Russell Nelson
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet... John Kelsey
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's ... David Honig
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of ... John Kelsey
- Microsoft Condoms (may have pinholes) (Re:... David Honig
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES ... Matt Blaze
- RE: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES ... Rodger, William
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES ... Dennis Glatting
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES ... Dennis Glatting
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES ... Matt Blaze
- RE: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES ... Paul Kierstead
- RE: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of ... David Honig
- RE: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use... Arnold G. Reinhold
- RE: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet... Rick Smith
- Re: NSA back doors in encryption ... John Gilmore
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Ben Laurie
- Re: NSA back doors in enc... Enzo Michelangeli
- Re: NSA back doors in enc... Ben Laurie
