>Enzo Michelangeli noted some primality checking software: >> CERTIFIX is an executable for Win95, Win98, NT (hardware Intel >> compatible). And Ben Laurie wrote: >'nuff said! Of course, this increases the size of the conspiracy at Microsoft -- if you have anti-backdoor code, then Microsoft needs to assign people to write backdoor code to disable the anti-backdoor code. Is that anti-anti-backdoor code, or anti-backdoor-backdoor code? Rick. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES inste... Dennis Glatting
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES inste... Matt Blaze
- RE: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES inste... Paul Kierstead
- RE: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES ... David Honig
- RE: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of ... Arnold G. Reinhold
- RE: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use... Rick Smith
- Re: NSA back doors in encryption produ... John Gilmore
- Re: NSA back doors in encryption ... Ben Laurie
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Enzo Michelangeli
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Ben Laurie
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Rick Smith
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Ben Laurie
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Rick Smith
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Bill Stewart
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Ben Laurie
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Matt Crawford
- Re: NSA back doors in encryption ... Rick Smith
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Rick Smith
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Eugene Leitl
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Enzo Michelangeli
