--
t 01:41 PM 7/27/2000 -0400, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> I'll also note that provably secure multicast is an ongoing project
> over at Honeyman's CITI.
I do not understand what is meant by "provably secure". One can only prove
security against a particular threat. There will always be yet another
attack. Few things are secure against rubber hoses and hot pincers, or
against foolishness and carelessness, which tends to be even more common
than rubber hoses.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
hgnaRqit9agzllSnw2X9yTc3Mv4mTDsHIYCVcnHj
4Wzk/YmMsX8xsDK6uqPjsGnGsXCOQbZgT9lVrh1Th
- A proposal for secure videoconferencing and video me... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and... eli+
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and... Eugene Leitl
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferen... Steve Reid
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconf... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure vide... Steve Reid
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and... amanda
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing... William Allen Simpson
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferen... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconf... Rich Salz
- Re: A proposal for secure vide... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure ... Derek Atkins
- Re: A proposal for secure ... RL 'Bob' Morgan
- Re: A proposal for secure ... R. Hirschfeld
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and... amanda
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and... Lynn . Wheeler
