It looks as if your VERIFIABILITY constraints allow pay-for-vote to take place. The voter V can show his audit number to ward-heeler W, who can subsequently verify, together with poll-watcher P, that V voted for Boss B. The PRIVACY section does not seem strong enough to prevent this. Ten years in Chicago will damage anyone's faith in the system. About as much so as ten weeks in DC, I imagine. Matt
- electronic ballots William Allen Simpson
- Re: electronic ballots Matt Crawford
- Re: electronic ballots William Allen Simpson
- Re: electronic ballots David Honig
- Re: electronic ballots William Allen Simpson
- Re: electronic ballots John Kelsey
- Re: electronic ballots Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: electronic ballots (Mr) Lyn R. Kennedy
- Re: electronic ballots Carl Ellison
- Re: electronic ballots Bill Stewart
- Re: electronic ballots Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: electronic ballots Ed Gerck