-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Gee, is Tatu going to yell at them too?
(Refer to
http://slashdot.org/articles/01/02/14/1120247.shtml
if you don't know what I'm talking about.)
One would think that after several years of IETF work on standardizing
(that which is called SecSH in the IETF and is commonly known
on the street as 'ssh'), they'd have noticed before now that
the 'kleenex' effect has happened to the term 'ssh'.
Or is this all a motivational exercise to get people to implement
Telnet over TLS, so we can stop using SecSH-compatible implementations?
(Of course, telnet over IPsec would work to, as would many other
things...)
Intellectual Property turf wars do not necessarily increase
sales, in fact in this case they may well damage them. They
also don't improve reputation capital, which is something one
tends to not want to reduce if you're in the security business.
At 10:28 AM 2/12/01 +0000, Charles M. Hannum wrote:
>The newly announced FreSSH,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0
iQA/AwUBOoshrz/0TyQ4fTjtEQLCWgCeK+HQYan9PiABRTHgsUha3mvHjnAAoM7b
4WzyCggnZNo0suwrVcYuUQ3T
=Hm+R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
