Thanks for the info. I can only tell that I use it to integrate with a closed system with limited crypto that only supports KBKDFCMAC.
Krzysiek -----Original Message----- From: Cryptography-dev <cryptography-dev-bounces+k.jackiewicz=samsung....@python.org> On Behalf Of Paul Kehrer Sent: Thursday, August 5, 2021 2:46 PM To: cryptography-dev@python.org Subject: Re: [Cryptography-dev] KBKDFCMAC review We'll review it as soon as we have bandwidth, thanks for the contribution. What's your use case for KBKDFCMAC by the way? -Paul On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 3:36 AM Krzysztof Jackiewicz/Security (PLT) /SRPOL/Engineer/삼성전자 <k.jackiew...@samsung.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > My PR > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=2398fd4c-7c03c44e-23997603-0cc47a312ab0-201701d7e207433a&q=1&e=34969df5-3e2d-4f09-a4ff-0c2ddf5670f9&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpyca%2Fcryptography%2Fpull%2F6181 > has finally passed all the checks. Is there anything else I should do > initiate the review? > > Thanks in advance > > Krzysiek > > > _______________________________________________ > Cryptography-dev mailing list > Cryptography-dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev _______________________________________________ Cryptography-dev mailing list Cryptography-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev _______________________________________________ Cryptography-dev mailing list Cryptography-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev
