Re-sending to list since I accidentally sent this solely to Oleg! Sorry about that Oleg.
-Paul On Oct 30, 2024, at 7:02 AM, Paul Kehrer <paul.l.keh...@gmail.com> wrote:
We would be willing to take support for this since it’s just some asn.1 definitions and there’s a specification associated with it. If the diff is larger than 400 lines then for ease of review we’ll likely want to break this into multiple PRs, but otherwise feel free to submit and we can discuss!
-Paul On Oct 30, 2024, at 5:51 AM, Oleg Höfling <oleg.hoefl...@gmail.com> wrote:
Is there a published spec that defines the ASN.1 syntax for these extensions (maybe from BSI)? We generally like to have a specification that we can use as a source of truth. For x509 I don’t have any objection to adding this assuming a spec exists.
-Paul Dear devs,
If you agree that it could be a viable addition to the project, I would gladly contribute the necessary bits myself. I made a proof-of-concept implementation for the Admissions extension in my fork of `cryptography` to have something to discuss:
Of course, this is far from the state where it can be reviewed, should be split into smaller patches, is missing tests and docs etc etc.
If you reject the idea, I would try and put the code in a separate library that depends on `cryptography` and connect them together somehow. I would be grateful for any advices on that matter - maybe you already had a case with a third party extension for `cryptography` being built.
Last but not least - I really enjoyed hacking the working prototype together and fiddling with the Rust backend, kudos for having such a clear and concise API design!
Kind regards,
Oleg
_______________________________________________Cryptography-dev mailing listCryptography-dev@python.orghttps://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev
|