Cryptography-Digest Digest #398, Volume #14 Sun, 20 May 01 18:13:01 EDT
Contents:
Re: taking your PC in for repair? WARNING: What will they ("EE Support")
Re: taking your PC in for repair? WARNING: What will they find? ("EE Support")
Re: taking your PC in for repair? WARNING: What will they ("EE Support")
Re: taking your PC in for repair? WARNING: What will they ("EE Support")
Re: We are a scam - Like This Post Is.... ("EE Support")
Re: Evidence Eliminator Detractors Working Hard But No Result? ("EE Support")
Re: We are a scam - Like This Post Is.... ("EE Support")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "EE Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.privacy,alt.security.pgp,alt.security.scramdisk,alt.privacy.anon-server
Subject: Re: taking your PC in for repair? WARNING: What will they
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 22:48:55 +0100
Eric Lee Green is exposed for posting blatant lies about Evidence
Eliminator. He has been proved to be lying in this debate.
Don't get dis-informed - get the facts:
Eric Lee Green targets Evidence Eliminator users with false web pages:
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/dis-information.shtml
--
Best Regards,
The Evidence Eliminator Support Team
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support.shtml
--
Technical Support Questions: Before submitting additional questions,
please make sure you have searched the Evidence Eliminator
KnowledgeBase online which can answer most questions instantly at
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support/kb/search.shtml
"Eric Lee Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 19 May 2001 13:24:42 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Another lying shit. I've used it for about 2 years and it does
> >EVERYTHING they say it does. And they only ones who screw up their
>
> Indeed? So you've taken it to a testing lab or data recovery house and
> had them attempt to recover data, and the data could not be recovered?
> Which data recovery house? Can you forward us a copy of their results?
> We've been asking for those results for several weeks now, and have
> gotten nothing but arrogant "It works because we say it works!"
> replies out of the EE guys (see
> http://badtux.org/eric/editorial/ee-arrogant2.html for an example).
>
> >systems with such a powerful tool are the idiots who never read
> >instructions.
>
> Probably guys like:
>
> http://badtux.org/eric/editorial/ee-fat.html
>
> who may not be the brightest bulb when it comes to computer stuff. But
> a *PROFESSIONAL* (as vs. some arrogant twit selling software out of his
> back bedroom) doesn't brow-beat his customers, accuse his customers of
> being an idiot, etc. Only an amateur operation does stupid stuff like
> that. Customer service is *NOT* what a stallion does to a mare, guy.
> Customer service is being polite, helpful, and keeping your opinion of
> the idiots who call you to yourself.
>
> I've watched technical support pros handle irate callers, and almost
> always, by being polite, helpful, and by remembering the magic mantra
> "What can I do to help you be satisfied?", they've managed to get the
> customer calmed down and supportive of the company and its products.
> Sometimes it's required refunding money, and when that happens, it's done
> in a professional manner.
>
> >Evidence Eliminator works - and damn near every EE user will tell you
>
> We've been asking for evidence to support this assertation for three
> weeks now. Where's the report from the data recovery house that tried to
> recover data, and failed? Where's the report from a crime lab that's
> attempted to recover data, and failed? Simply shouting "it works because
> we say it works" is not enough when we're talking about people relying
upon
> it for their safety. If someone tried to sell a part to Boeing to put into
> a jet airliner, and told Boeing "it works because we say it works" when
> Boeing asks "what testing lab did you use to verify the strength and
> dimensions of this part?", Boeing Security would kick their rear out the
> door so fast there'd be scorch marks down the hallway. When you're
trusting
> your life to something, you do NOT rely on somebody's unsupported word.
>
> >that. Of course their testimony is discounted as shilling for the
> >company, so all that is left are the claims of the idiots who have
> >never used it.
>
> No claims here, just reporting the facts as I have documented
> them. Everything on my page is a matter of public record and can
> easily be verified against the original source (except for the EMAILs
> I've received detailing the abusive treatment that dissatisfied
> customers receive when they try to get in touch with EE Support).
> See http://badtux.org/eric/editorial/scumbags.html .
>
> >As for their spamming. Most of it comes from idiots who are trying to
> >ruin its reputation. You read most of those spam posts and they are
> >only half literate.
>
> You go to the affiliate pages associated with those spam posts, and
> they are typically black helicopter paranoia conspiracy types, often
> folks who (until McVeigh blew up the Oklahoma City federal building)
> were in those "militias". I agree that most of those spam posts are
> only half-literate. On the other hand, the web pages of the affiliates
> pumping out the spam posts are only half-literate too. (And I *WILL*
> note that most of the spam seems identically worded, though the
> misspellings differ from spam to spam... it all appears to be typed
> into the computer directly off of Evidence Eliminator promotional
> materials).
>
> **
> Eric Lee Green mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> GnuPG public key at http://badtux.org/eric/eric.gpg
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE7BwVG3DrrK1kMA04RAmYfAKCfLGbaf0D1JEjuNG2PLnz+wYkn6wCgpCdI
> SbojblWVT2mclIG7MkloOio=
> =UuXy
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Eric Lee Green is exposed for posting blatant lies about Evidence
Eliminator. He has been proved to be lying in this debate.
Don't get dis-informed - get the facts:
Eric Lee Green targets Evidence Eliminator users with false web pages:
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/dis-information.shtml
--
Best Regards,
The Evidence Eliminator Support Team
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support.shtml
--
Technical Support Questions: Before submitting additional questions,
please make sure you have searched the Evidence Eliminator
KnowledgeBase online which can answer most questions instantly at
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support/kb/search.shtml
------------------------------
From: "EE Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.privacy,alt.security.pgp,alt.security.scramdisk,alt.privacy.anon-server
Subject: Re: taking your PC in for repair? WARNING: What will they find?
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 22:48:57 +0100
Eric Lee Green is exposed for posting blatant lies about Evidence
Eliminator. He has been proved to be lying in this debate.
Don't get dis-informed - get the facts:
Eric Lee Green targets Evidence Eliminator users with false web pages:
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/dis-information.shtml
--
Best Regards,
The Evidence Eliminator Support Team
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support.shtml
--
Technical Support Questions: Before submitting additional questions,
please make sure you have searched the Evidence Eliminator
KnowledgeBase online which can answer most questions instantly at
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support/kb/search.shtml
"Eric Lee Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> LMB wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 May 2001 13:32:53 -0400, P.Dulles <*@*.com> wrote:
> > >Let's try to be fair. They aren't, this just further substantiates and
> > >strengthens our argument.
> >
> > Oh, I'll be fair, very fair. What I will do is to NEVER buy a product
> > from any company that resorts to SPAM in an attempt to sell their
> > product. Since EE is a major spammer I will never buy their product.
> > We should stop this needless arguing and each of us simply send the
> > message to the writers of EE that their SPAM has resulted in creating
> > a non buyer for them. THAT is the effective message.
>
> I'm not sure how effective that message is though. One of my prior
> employers had very amateurish marketing materials. They were black and
> white scare tactic ads similar to Evidence Eliminator's. I remember
> seeing these ads before working for them and thinking "gosh, what a
> bunch of maroons" and going about my business. But the company did
> manage to stay in business with those ads. I asked the company
> president, many years later (when it clicked that this was the same
> company), about those terrible ads. His reply was that hey, they worked,
> they kept the company in business for several years didn't they? Of
> course, he did not see all the business that he lost from the immature
> and unprofessional ads. All he saw was the business that he won that
> way, which was less than it would have been with professional ads but he
> couldn't see that.
>
> I suspect that the EE people are saying the same thing to themselves,
> and ironically screwing themselves out of major $$$ because this is
> ruining their reputation for years. I remember what a guy at a major
> computer company told me about that former employer's product, "we'll
> never deal with them again, because we dealt with them years ago and
> they were arrogant and unprofessional and sold us a bill of goods." Even
> though the company was now under different management and operated in a
> professional manner, those bad feelings persisted 10 years after the
> deed had been done.
>
> --
> Eric Lee Green mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Lee Green is exposed for posting blatant lies about Evidence
Eliminator. He has been proved to be lying in this debate.
Don't get dis-informed - get the facts:
Eric Lee Green targets Evidence Eliminator users with false web pages:
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/dis-information.shtml
--
Best Regards,
The Evidence Eliminator Support Team
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support.shtml
--
Technical Support Questions: Before submitting additional questions,
please make sure you have searched the Evidence Eliminator
KnowledgeBase online which can answer most questions instantly at
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support/kb/search.shtml
------------------------------
From: "EE Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.privacy,alt.security.pgp,alt.security.scramdisk,alt.privacy.anon-server
Subject: Re: taking your PC in for repair? WARNING: What will they
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 22:49:00 +0100
Eric Lee Green is exposed for posting blatant lies about Evidence
Eliminator. He has been proved to be lying in this debate.
Don't get dis-informed - get the facts:
Eric Lee Green targets Evidence Eliminator users with false web pages:
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/dis-information.shtml
--
Best Regards,
The Evidence Eliminator Support Team
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support.shtml
--
Technical Support Questions: Before submitting additional questions,
please make sure you have searched the Evidence Eliminator
KnowledgeBase online which can answer most questions instantly at
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support/kb/search.shtml
"Eric Lee Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Fri, 18 May 2001 22:18:46 GMT, Regulator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Fri, 18 May 2001 17:26:45 -0400 , An Metet
> >:o)You are forgetting the FIRST and most important rule of advertising;
> >:o)"ANY publicity is good publicity".. You Yanks should know, you
> >:o)invented it..
>
> >Dr.John, at least if people lurk at these groups they will see another
side
> >to the EE debate. I can imagine a lot of people who have heard of EE and
go
> >visit the EE site, will have a lot of questions regarding the
advertisement
> >of the product.
>
> I personally make it a point to not mention the youngsters unless one of
> their spammers or anonymous "supporters" post first. At that point,
> it simply becomes a matter of telling people who might believe these
> anonymous "supporters" exactly what kind of business they're considering
> buying software from.
>
> I feel that facts are important, and that if only one side of the
> story is being told, the other side needs to be told too. If anonymous
> "supporters" are going to post their messages, then the rest of us
> certainly can post ours.
>
> Frankly, I don't go out of my way to think about the kids every day. I
> have a life, after all. It's only when they bring themselves to my
> attention that I bother with them.
>
> --
> Eric Lee Green mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Lee Green is exposed for posting blatant lies about Evidence
Eliminator. He has been proved to be lying in this debate.
Don't get dis-informed - get the facts:
Eric Lee Green targets Evidence Eliminator users with false web pages:
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/dis-information.shtml
--
Best Regards,
The Evidence Eliminator Support Team
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support.shtml
--
Technical Support Questions: Before submitting additional questions,
please make sure you have searched the Evidence Eliminator
KnowledgeBase online which can answer most questions instantly at
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support/kb/search.shtml
------------------------------
From: "EE Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.privacy,alt.security.pgp,alt.security.scramdisk,alt.privacy.anon-server
Subject: Re: taking your PC in for repair? WARNING: What will they
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 22:49:03 +0100
Eric Lee Green is exposed for posting blatant lies about Evidence
Eliminator. He has been proved to be lying in this debate.
Don't get dis-informed - get the facts:
Eric Lee Green targets Evidence Eliminator users with false web pages:
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/dis-information.shtml
--
Best Regards,
The Evidence Eliminator Support Team
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support.shtml
--
Technical Support Questions: Before submitting additional questions,
please make sure you have searched the Evidence Eliminator
KnowledgeBase online which can answer most questions instantly at
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support/kb/search.shtml
"Eric Lee Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 20 May 2001 13:50:34 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >You're a known EE hater who has continually tried to destroy their
> >company.
>
> Excuse me, but I've always stated that once these lying scumbag
> bastards take my picture and any reference to me off of their
> disinformation web page, I'm through with them. Get this straight:
> Unlike you, I have a life, dude. I don't have time to be messing with
> spammers or caring about spammers. The only reason I'm doing it in
> this case is because they decided to be lying scumbags and put that
> bullshit onto their disinformation page, all based on a single (*ONE*)
> post that I made months before stating that I didn't think their
> conduct was professional.
>
> Until April 2001, when I discovered their libel page, I had made a
> *SINGLE POST* (the one they quoted) about Evidence Eliminator or the
> two young men who run the company. I just don't care enough to gather
> materials about these spammers just out of thin air. It is only when
> they libel me on their web page, violate my copyrights on materials
> from my web page, and otherwise pull me into the situation
> *PERSONALLY* that I become motivated to show the rest of the world
> just what kind of slimey, lying spamming scumbags these two young men
> really are.
>
> They libel me on their web page, they violate my copyrights on materials
> they obtained from my web page without permission, they are spammers,
> liars, and copyright violators. I'm sorry. The fact that you can make
> excuses for these scumbags goes beyond unbelievable. Go crawl under
> whatever spamming rock you slinked out from under. See if we care.
>
> >Why don't you hold every other company which makes registry compactors
> >or cleaners to the same standard? Why don't you hold SCORCH and many,
> >many other companies to this same standard of disclosure? You don't
>
> Simple. Because the makers of SCORCH haven't stolen and republished
> copyrighted materials from my web site, and because they have
> consistently replied in a professional manner (as vs. arrogant
> know-it-all manner) when questions were asked about their product.
>
> >You have no business in the Scramdisk nor anon server groups, nor in
>
> I don't go anywhere that you and your spamming affiliates go. I post
> on one newsgroup about EE -- alt.privacy. If you and your spamming
> affiliates cross-post to a dozen news groups that include alt.privacy,
> it's not my job to trim down the newsgroups list.
>
> >for me seeing anymore of this crap - now way. All future EE bashing
> >and bashers go into a kill filter. I've had it with this whole
> >subject.
>
> Excellent. Then answer these questions:
>
> *WHY* do you defend a company that libels a respected member of the Linux
> and Open Source community on their very own home page?
>
> *WHY* do you defend a company that violates the copyrights of a
> respected member of the Linux and Open Source community by
> republishing (in violate of the Bern Conventions) copyrighted
> materials that belong to somebody else?
>
> *WHY* do you defend a company, that when technical details are asked
> about the product, either avoids answering the question or arrogantly
> replies "It works because we say it works and you can't prove it
> doesn't" (while makers of competing products will give you technical
> details about how it works)?
>
> Unless -- oh gosh golly. You're either one of their spamming affiliates,
> or, could you be the mysterious Mr. Ride? (I doubt that Mr. Churchill
> has the sense to post anonymously).
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE7B/MS3DrrK1kMA04RAgXqAKDPszqj25vJUof6PthCvDb+hbSXywCcClKD
> x3me6wISmbg6QtH7mKtvmDM=
> =3CrQ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Eric Lee Green is exposed for posting blatant lies about Evidence
Eliminator. He has been proved to be lying in this debate.
Don't get dis-informed - get the facts:
Eric Lee Green targets Evidence Eliminator users with false web pages:
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/dis-information.shtml
--
Best Regards,
The Evidence Eliminator Support Team
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support.shtml
--
Technical Support Questions: Before submitting additional questions,
please make sure you have searched the Evidence Eliminator
KnowledgeBase online which can answer most questions instantly at
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support/kb/search.shtml
------------------------------
From: "EE Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.privacy,alt.security.pgp,alt.security.scramdisk,alt.privacy.anon-server
Subject: Re: We are a scam - Like This Post Is....
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 22:49:06 +0100
Eric Lee Green is exposed for posting blatant lies about Evidence
Eliminator. He has been proved to be lying in this debate.
Don't get dis-informed - get the facts:
Eric Lee Green targets Evidence Eliminator users with false web pages:
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/dis-information.shtml
--
Best Regards,
The Evidence Eliminator Support Team
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support.shtml
--
Technical Support Questions: Before submitting additional questions,
please make sure you have searched the Evidence Eliminator
KnowledgeBase online which can answer most questions instantly at
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support/kb/search.shtml
"Eric Lee Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> EE Support wrote:
> > "Eric Lee Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > Eric Lee Green investigates, snoops and tries to harass the EE company
and
> > it's principals. But Eric Green is exposed at
>
> Actually, I don't investigate. I don't have to. For some reason people
> are just motivated to mail me stuff about you guys. I don't know why. I
> guess it's your sterling character and professional behavior that
> motivate them to do it. Like the poor guy whose mailed me the story I
> just posted on my web site, who managed to goof up and lose the FAT
> table on one of his hard drives and you brow-beat him and accused him of
> being an idiot. That is NOT the way to win friends and influence people.
> I suggest that you start with this book to see what I'm talking about:
>
> http://www.westegg.com/unmaintained/carnegie/win-friends.html
>
> As for harass, I am not the person who put up a harassing web site
> claiming some vast conspiracy because a security professional dissed
> your professionalism. You're the person who did that. I'm the person who
> discovered it four months later in the course of a random Google search.
> And I am not the person violating your copyrights. You are the person
> violating my copyrights (guess what, my photograph, the one you ripped
> off of my web page, the one so prominently displayed on your own web
> page, is copyrighted -- by *ME*). I am not the criminal. You are. 'Nuff
> said.
>
> Oh, if by "harass" you mean that I forward spam that you or one of your
> contractors EMAIL to me (at one of my many EMAIL addresses) to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], well, that's not harassment, that's good citizenship.
> UUNET-UK has an Acceptable Use policy. You agreed to it when you signed
> up for UUNET service. In case you have forgotten the URL, here it is:
>
> http://www.uk.uu.net/customerservices/usepolicy/
>
> I suggest that you especially read the last paragraph:
>
> INDIRECT OR ATTEMPTED VIOLATIONS OF THIS POLICY, AND ACTUAL OR ATTEMPTED
> VIOLATIONS BY A THIRD PARTY ON BEHALF OF A UUNET CUSTOMER OR A CUSTOMERS
> END USER, SHALL BE CONSIDERED VIOLATIONS OF THIS POLICY BY SUCH CUSTOMER
> OR END USER.
>
> Sorry guy, if your affiliates spam to drive customers to your site, the
> UUNET acceptable use policy says that it's the same thing as if you
> yourself are spamming. I make it a habit to report all spam to
> abuse@[whatever-isp-dot-com], and I don't make an exception for Evidence
> Eliminator spam. I encourage all others to do the same thing -- report
> all spam to the ISP of the spammer (if the spammer's name is not
> obvious, e.g., via following a URL that's in the message, this can
> generally be discovered by using ARIN to trace the source IP address in
> the headers, the EMAIL address is virtually always always a forgery).
>
> > http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/dis-information.shtml
> >
> > Eric makes false web pages about Evidence Eliminator. Proof available at
> > that link above.
>
> I just viewed that link again, all I found was the same tired old
> retread stuff. Black helicopter department of defense conspiracy yada
> yada bullshit. Hell, in case you're a totally maroon, my former
> employer, the one you claim is involved in this "vast conspiracy" loony
> theory of yours, isn't even in business anymore. Not that I think it
> matters to you. After all, you're
> the same guy who says "We don't spam" and then do spam (see
> http://ehome/badtux/eric/editorial/eespam5.html ). The truth appears to
> be, err, flexible, to you. Sad, sad case. Delusional paranoia? Or just a
> crude attempt at a snow job?
>
> --
> Eric Lee Green mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Lee Green is exposed for posting blatant lies about Evidence
Eliminator. He has been proved to be lying in this debate.
Don't get dis-informed - get the facts:
Eric Lee Green targets Evidence Eliminator users with false web pages:
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/dis-information.shtml
--
Best Regards,
The Evidence Eliminator Support Team
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support.shtml
--
Technical Support Questions: Before submitting additional questions,
please make sure you have searched the Evidence Eliminator
KnowledgeBase online which can answer most questions instantly at
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support/kb/search.shtml
------------------------------
From: "EE Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.privacy,alt.security.pgp,alt.security.scramdisk,alt.privacy.anon-server
Subject: Re: Evidence Eliminator Detractors Working Hard But No Result?
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 22:49:08 +0100
Eric Lee Green is exposed for posting blatant lies about Evidence
Eliminator. He has been proved to be lying in this debate.
Don't get dis-informed - get the facts:
Eric Lee Green targets Evidence Eliminator users with false web pages:
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/dis-information.shtml
--
Best Regards,
The Evidence Eliminator Support Team
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support.shtml
--
Technical Support Questions: Before submitting additional questions,
please make sure you have searched the Evidence Eliminator
KnowledgeBase online which can answer most questions instantly at
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support/kb/search.shtml
"Eric Lee Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Tue, 15 May 2001 23:55:25 GMT, Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >EE Support wrote:
> >> There are those who occupy these newsgroups who's last intention is
talking
> >> about facts :-)
> >
> >Yes, you are still here.
>
> I see they still have not addressed the fact of the unprofessional
> behavior of their employee on this newsgroup, for example. Or the fact
> of their unprofessional behavior in advertising their competitors and
> critics.
>
> I have no comment about the product itself, but the company
> has a definite image and attitude problem.
>
> --
> Eric Lee Green mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Lee Green is exposed for posting blatant lies about Evidence
Eliminator. He has been proved to be lying in this debate.
Don't get dis-informed - get the facts:
Eric Lee Green targets Evidence Eliminator users with false web pages:
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/dis-information.shtml
--
Best Regards,
The Evidence Eliminator Support Team
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support.shtml
--
Technical Support Questions: Before submitting additional questions,
please make sure you have searched the Evidence Eliminator
KnowledgeBase online which can answer most questions instantly at
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support/kb/search.shtml
>
------------------------------
From: "EE Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.privacy,alt.security.pgp,alt.security.scramdisk,alt.privacy.anon-server
Subject: Re: We are a scam - Like This Post Is....
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 22:49:12 +0100
All the PGP signatures in the world won't help Eric Lee Green.
Eric Lee Green is exposed for posting blatant lies about Evidence
Eliminator. He has been proved to be lying in this debate.
Don't get dis-informed - get the facts:
Eric Lee Green targets Evidence Eliminator users with false web pages:
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/dis-information.shtml
--
Best Regards,
The Evidence Eliminator Support Team
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support.shtml
--
Technical Support Questions: Before submitting additional questions,
please make sure you have searched the Evidence Eliminator
KnowledgeBase online which can answer most questions instantly at
http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/support/kb/search.shtml
"Eric Lee Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 19 May 2001 17:59:48 -0500, Eric Lee Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (message zapped)
>
> Oh, because there have been people forging messages on this newsgroup
> purporting to be other people (I'm thinking of the twit who forged a
> message purporting to be EESupport), my GNUpg public key is available
> at http://badtux.org/eric/eric.gpg for importing into your keyring for
> verifying that my posts are, indeed, my posts, and not forgeries from
> OTHER twits.
>
> **
> Eric Lee Green mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE7Bv3H3DrrK1kMA04RArkcAKCJpf81q4DGfHuO048WAzhdjePNuQCdHpVR
> 8OI/RqjKt44N/X/DisyR8VQ=
> =H3ZP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to sci.crypt.
End of Cryptography-Digest Digest
******************************
