At 06:09 PM 12/4/98 -0500, Steve Bellovin wrote: > >I'm glad the site is up, but for many purposes it solves the wrong problem. >Encryption algorithms are easy to write, or even to type in or scan from >printed programs. But what's interesting is easy-to-use crypto, or >crypto that can interoperate. Remember that most of PGP is *not* >crypto algorithms. > But...wrapper programs (provided they are generic, such as a really configurable text editor) are not export controlled, all the user needs is the engine. I can imagine all sorts of flexible email programs.... Jay
- Re: Wassenaar vs. CipherSaber Jim Gillogly
- Re: Wassenaar vs. CipherSaber Steve Bellovin
- Re: Wassenaar vs. CipherSaber Jay Holovacs
- Re: Wassenaar vs. CipherSaber Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Wassenaar vs. CipherSaber Raph Levien
- Negotiation (Re: Wassenaar vs. CipherSaber... Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Wassenaar vs. CipherSaber EKR
- Re: Wassenaar vs. CipherSaber Nelson Minar
- Re: Wassenaar vs. CipherSaber Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: Wassenaar vs. CipherSaber Jay Sulzberger
- Re: Wassenaar vs. CipherSaber Jay Sulzberger
- Re: Wassenaar vs. CipherSaber Jim Gillogly
- Re: Wassenaar vs. CipherSaber Enzo Michelangeli
