Rob Lemos wrote: > http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2189721,00.html This just seems like FUD to me. ID numbers should help detect theft and fraud. They aren't going to compromise privacy. I expect it's going to behave just like the debugging registers. Nobody is going to be able to get at your chip's ID without running software on your system. -- What is appropriate for the master is not appropriate| Tom Weinstein for the novice. You must understand Tao before | [EMAIL PROTECTED] transcending structure. -- The Tao of Programming |
- A different take on Intel's RSA announcements Rob Lemos
- Re: A different take on Intel's RSA announcements Jamie Fifield
- Re: A different take on Intel's RSA announceme... Derek Atkins
- Re: A different take on Intel's RSA announcements Tom Weinstein
- Re: A different take on Intel's RSA announceme... Alan Olsen
- Re: A different take on Intel's RSA announ... Tom Weinstein
- Re: A different take on Intel's RSA announceme... Matt Curtin
- Re: A different take on Intel's RSA announcements Anonymous
- Re: A different take on Intel's RSA announcements Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: A different take on Intel's RSA announcements Rob Lemos
