Colin Plumb wrote:
> I didn't think of it at the time, but this has the added bonus that
> deterministic systems have a harder time generating non-white noise, so
> if you look at the bit stream and see a noise spectrum that corresponds
> to the (claimed) underlying physical source, that is some assurance
> against cheating.
Be careful. You give me a physical source's power spectrum, I'll give
you a digital filter to color the PRNG to match.
--
Eli Brandt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~eli/
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Markus Kuhn
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 David Honig
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Michael Motyka
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Dan Geer
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 James A. Donald
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 David Honig
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Alex Alten
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Ben Laurie
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Colin Plumb
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Eli Brandt
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Colin Plumb
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Adam Back
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 David Honig
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Russell Nelson
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 David R. Conrad
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 David R. Conrad
