On Fri, 5 Feb 1999, bram wrote: > I have a theory that no matter what computing machine is available, as > long as the same machine is available to both the encrypter and the > cracker, the cracker wins (barring non-turing complete machinery, of > course.) Jim Gillogly pointed out that I misspoke - I meant to say 'the encrypter wins' -Bram
- Re: quantum cryptanalysis Ted Lemon
- Re: quantum cryptanalysis John Gilmore
- Re: quantum cryptanalysis John R Levine
- Re: quantum cryptanalysis lcs Mixmaster Remailer
- Re: quantum cryptanalysis Ulrich Kuehn
- RE: quantum cryptanalysis Brown, R Ken
- Re: quantum cryptanalysis John Kelsey
- Re: quantum cryptanalysis Bruce Schneier
- Re: quantum cryptanalysis bram
- Re: quantum cryptanalysis bram
- Re: quantum cryptanalysis Michael Motyka
- Re: quantum cryptanalysis Bill Stewart
