For an only slighted dated summary on mask laws see http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/clipper1.htm#ToC54 For a discussion of anonymity laws see http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/ocean.htm And yes, it's a real case, decided as you heard, but I don't have the citation handy. On Mon, 17 May 1999, Dave Del Torto wrote: > Forgive me for lacking further specifics just now, but an anonymous > lawyer friend tells me that the May 11, 1999 edition of the "San > Francisco Daily Journal" reported that a federal district judge > declared a (n unspecified) city's ordinance --forbidding the wearing > of masks, hoods or any device in public to conceal one's identity > (except for religious, safety or medical reasons)-- as being > *unconstitutional* (!). > > The city in question, according to this (so far) hearsay evidence, > was trying to discourage a Ku Klux Klan rally. The KKK claimed itself > a "religion" and that the hoods protect its members from retaliation > (how deliciously ironic). The court agreed that the mask ban was an > unconstitutional violation of the Klansmen's right to free speech and > to anonymous association in public. > > Wow! First the Bernstein decision, and now this? Wait, someone pinch > me... I think I'm dreaming about the country I hope I live in, and > not the one I wake up to every day... Imagine: if both judgements > hold, anonymous posting of crypto source code will be > constitutionally protected (as it should be). > > First Question: does anyone know which City is involved and/or where > the Judge's decision can be found? I'm afraid I don't have any more > info than what I've mentioned here, no date, no case name, etc. > > Second Question: can anyone cite/remember any other federal court > decision that protects one's right to remain anonymous (other than > those protecting victims or people in federal witness protection > programs, etc)? > > If true, this case may have fascinating implications for > internet-based forms of anonymous association such as using ZKS' > Freedom.Net service. > > dave > > > -- A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | [EMAIL PROTECTED] U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA +1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm --> It's hot here. <--
Re: Is anonymous speech protected?
Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law Mon, 17 May 1999 18:22:39 -0700
- Everyone wants in on the act... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: Everyone wants in on the... Marc Horowitz
- Is anonymous speech prot... Dave Del Torto
- Re: Is anonymous spe... Sameer Parekh
- Re: Is anonymous spe... Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
- Re: Is anonymous... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: Is anonymous spe... Jim McCoy
- Re: Is anonymous... Greg Broiles
- Re: Is anonymous spe... William H. Geiger III
- Re: Is anonymous spe... Lee Tien
