RFC 1750 recommends the Blum Blum Shub generator. Donald From: bram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 16:18:20 -0700 (PDT) To: Eugene Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Eugene Leitl wrote: > >> Does anybody know how cellular automata perform re cryptographically >> solid random number generators? They can crank out a lot of integers >> with a minimum investment in instructions executed. > >Most of the fancy reseedable PRNG schemes people have come up with are >based on using secure hashes. > >-Bram > >
- depleting the random number generator John Denker
- Re: depleting the random number generator Ben Laurie
- Re: depleting the random number generator bram
- Re: depleting the random number generator Eugene Leitl
- Re: depleting the random number genera... bram
- Re: depleting the random number ge... Eugene Leitl
- Re: depleting the random numb... bram
- Re: depleting the random ... Sandy Harris
- Re: depleting the random number ge... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: depleting the random numb... Eric Murray
- Re: depleting the random number generator Russell Nelson
- Re: depleting the random number generator Mike Brodhead
- Re: depleting the random number generator Bill Stewart
- Re: depleting the random number generator James A. Donald
- Re: depleting the random number generator David Honig
- Re: depleting the random number generator Ben Laurie
- Re: depleting the random number genera... Bill Stewart