> "Provably secure" is a word applicable to cyphers, not protocols. To use > it in reference to a protocol is nonsense gibberish. A Google search on "provably secure protocol" comes up with, among others: http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/honey/talks/cardis98/tsld001.htm http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/bellare95provably.html http://www.nluug.nl/events/zomer97/progboekje/lezing3.html http://crypto.cs.mcgill.ca/proceedings/HTML/PDF/E92/307.PDF http://link.springer.de/link/service/series/0558/bibs/1807/18070156.htm It would appear that this Honeyman fellow is responsible for quite a bit of this gibberish ... - RL "Bob"
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing... Steve Reid
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferen... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconf... Steve Reid
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and vide... amanda
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and... William Allen Simpson
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferen... Rich Salz
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconf... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure vide... Derek Atkins
- Re: A proposal for secure vide... RL 'Bob' Morgan
- Re: A proposal for secure vide... R. Hirschfeld
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and vide... amanda
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and vide... Lynn . Wheeler