> "Provably secure" is a word applicable to cyphers, not protocols.  To use 
> it in reference to a protocol is nonsense gibberish.

A Google search on "provably secure protocol" comes up with, among others:

  http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/honey/talks/cardis98/tsld001.htm

  http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/bellare95provably.html

  http://www.nluug.nl/events/zomer97/progboekje/lezing3.html

  http://crypto.cs.mcgill.ca/proceedings/HTML/PDF/E92/307.PDF

  http://link.springer.de/link/service/series/0558/bibs/1807/18070156.htm

It would appear that this Honeyman fellow is responsible for quite a bit
of this gibberish ...

 - RL "Bob"



Reply via email to