iang wrote: > > Jill Ramonsky wrote: > > It's worth summing up the design goals here, so nobody gets confused. > > Trouble is, I haven't figured out what they should all be. The main > > point of confusion/contention right now seem to be (1) should it be in C > > or C++?, > > C. And write C++ wrappers or let someone else do it.
Yes! Speaking from experience, it's far easier to write a C++ wrapper for a C lib than the other way around. And as Ian said, it's probably easier to get the implementation correct in C, at least as a first pass. -- Roy M. Silvernail is [EMAIL PROTECTED], and you're not http://www.rant-central.com is the new scytale Never Forget: It's Only 1's and 0's! SpamAssassin->procmail->/dev/null->bliss --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
