At 5:56 AM -0700 10/8/03, Peter Gutmann wrote: >... it might be more >useful to create a user-friendly management interface to IPsec implementations >to join the zero or so already out there. The difficulty in setting up any >IPsec tunnel is what's been motivating the creation of (often insecure) non- >IPsec VPN software, so what'd be a lot more helpful than (no offense, but) yet >another SSL implementation is some means of making IPsec easier to use >(although that may not be possible... OK, let's say "less painful to use" :-).
Given that the application I had which needed IPSec for encryption was Voice over IP, I'd settle for a secure, point-to-point voice system which works when both ends have NAT with appropriately configured firewalls. Multi-point voice would be icing on the cake. Cheers - Bill ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | "There's nothing so clear as a | Periwinkle (408)356-8506 | vague idea you haven't written | 16345 Englewood Ave www.pwpconsult.com | down yet." -- Dean Tribble | Los Gatos, CA 95032 --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
