Ed Gerck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Jablon wrote: > >
> The 'second law' also takes precedence: ballots are always secret, only > vote totals are known and are known only after the election ends. > > > What I see in serious > > voting system research efforts are attempts to build systems that > > provide both accountability and privacy, with minimal tradeoffs. > > There is no tradeoff prossible for voter privacy and ballot secrecy. > Take away one of them and the voting process is no longer a valid > measure. Serious voting system research efforts do not begin by > denying the requirements. You get totals per nation, per state, per county, per riding, per precinct, per polling stion and maybe per ballot box. So there's a need to design the system to have more voters than ballot boxes to conform to your second law. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
